2011 Insanity

Busy year, but Cons Blog lives on in our minds. Perhaps a triumphant return next year.

Posted by Tim on December 9th, 2011 • • Comments Off

Is this thing on?

Posted by Tim on December 16th, 2010 • • Comments Off

Not News: Government Lies to Save Face

Sub-headline: as usual, it blows up in their face. News is coming out that the Office of Management and Budget blocked NOAA from releasing its worst case scenario estimates for the oil spill. Seriously? OMB? A spokesman said “”The issue was the modeling, the science and the assumptions they were using to come up with their analysis.” Right… so you hire a world-renowned (and officially recognized genius) scientist to head the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and then some economist in the budget office tells her organization they aren’t doing the modeling right?

Posted by Tim on October 7th, 2010 • • Comments Off
Tags:

Friday Insantity 2.35

This one’s for all of us who never thought we’d live long enough to one day hear Oprah Winfrey describe a kimono dragon hunting a water buffalo.

Posted by Brian on October 1st, 2010 • • Comments Off

Start Spreading the News

This year's Central Park coyote, caught in TriBeCa March 25, 2010

from New York Magazine :

Nature is prospering in New York. Yes, the otters, minks, bears, and mountain lions have long since disappeared. But nature as a whole—the ecosystem that is the harbor—never went away. In fact—and this may seem implausible—nature is in many ways more plentiful in New York City than it is in the surrounding suburbs and rural counties. New York is again a capital of nature; we are an ecological hot spot.

[Edit: and a Brashares lab member, Laura Prugh, interviewed by the Science Times about Coyotes today. /TB]

Posted by Brian on September 25th, 2010 • • Comments Off

A Dose of Leopold

I like all my metaphors for bureaucracy to be in the language of game hunting.

Aldo Leopold with dog

I had a bird dog named Gus. When Gus couldn’t find pheasants he worked up an enthusiasm for Sora rails and meadowlarks. This whipped-up zeal for unsatisfactory substitutes masked his failure to find the real thing. It assuaged his inner frustration.
-
We conservationists are like that. We set out a generation ago to convince the American landowner to control fire, to grow forests, to manage wildlife. He did not respond very well. We have virtually no forestry, and mighty little range management, game management, wildflower management, pollution control, or erosion control being practiced voluntarily by private landowners. In many instances the abuse of private land is worse than it was before we started. If you don’t believe that, watch the strawstacks burn on the Canadian prairies; watch the fertile mud flowing down the Rio Grande; watch the gullies climb the hillsides in the Palouse, in the Ozarks, in the riverbreaks of southern Iowa and western Wisconsin.
-
To assuage our inner frustration over this failure, we have found us a meadowlark. I don’t know which dog first caught the scent; I do know that every dog on the field whipped into an enthusiastic backingpoint. I did myself. The meadowlark was the idea that if the private landowner won’t practice conservation, let’s build a bureau to do it for him.
-
Like the meadowlark, this substitute has its good points. It smells like success. It is satisfactory on poor land which bureaus can buy. The trouble is that it contains no device for preventing good private land from becoming poor public land. There is danger in the assuagement of honest frustration; it helps us forget we have not yet found a pheasant.
-
I’m afraid the meadowlark is not going to remind us. He is flattered by his sudden importance.
-
Aldo Leopold, “The Round River”
Posted by Brian on September 20th, 2010 • • Comments Off

Seriously?

No naming names, but I just read a paper that used Wikipedia as a reference.

Posted by Tim on September 20th, 2010 • • Comments Off

Wrong in a good way

The Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (2000) predicted that the carbon market, then worth about $300 million annually, would be worth approximately $10 – $44 billion in 2010. By 2008, it was worth $126 billion.

Posted by Tim on September 17th, 2010 • • Comments Off

A Question for You

In the mid- to late-90s, there were a slew of papers (e.g. Costanza et al. 1997; Pimentel et al. 1997) estimating the economic value of global biodiversity. Estimates ranged from about $16 to $54 trillion. At that time, world GDP was about $30 trillion. So, a question: has human economic output finally exceeded natural economic production? When? Did anyone even notice that it happened?

p.s. A mountain lion was shot and killed near Chez Panisse earlier this week [thanks Clare].

Posted by Tim on September 2nd, 2010 • • Comments Off

Gone fishin’

In case you hadn’t noticed, consblog has been on hiatus due to field work outside of the deathly grip of the internet. See you in the fall.

Posted by Tim on August 6th, 2010 • • Comments Off